Use cases / Compliance and Audit
Use case
Adopt the compliance and security frameworks you answer to as rule packs, from OWASP ASVS to PCI DSS, GDPR and NIST SP 800-53. Every allow and deny lands on a hash-chained ledger, admin actions land in an audit log, and each customer has a database of their own.
From framework to evidence
Frameworks as rule packs, four shown
Every allow and deny, in order, on a chain that shows any edit.
Admin actions, with who and when
The answers, already there
What Uzera keeps for the audit
Guardrails enforces what you adopted. The other three are where the evidence lands.
Guardrails
OWASP ASVS, OWASP Top 10, OWASP API Security Top 10, CWE Top 25, NIST SSDF, NIST SP 800-53, PCI DSS, GDPR and ISO/SAE 21434 as rule packs, plus coding standards for languages like C#, TypeScript, JavaScript and Node.js, with more added regularly.
Trust
Every allow and deny, in order, with the rule that decided it, on a chain that shows any edit. The record of what the agents were allowed to do.
Trust
Rules adopted and changed, roles and permissions, API keys, AI configuration, team membership. Who did what, and when.
Trust
Isolation is physical, not a filter. Your data has its own database, and the connection to it is encrypted.
How the evidence builds up
Three steps, and the record writes itself while the team works.
Pick the frameworks you answer to and adopt them as rule packs. Scope them to a repository or the whole workspace.
Every allow and deny lands on the hash-chained ledger with the rule that decided it. Every admin change lands in the audit log.
When the auditor asks which rules applied, when, and who changed what, the answer is a filter on a record that already exists.
Where it fits
Before the budget conversation
The record of every allow and deny in order, the audit log of admin actions, and which framework rule each one came from.
No clone of your repository is ever taken. Three things are sent: the diff of the change under review, the names and locations of the symbols it touches, and the agent's conversation for that session. Nothing else. The index of your codebase stays on your machine.
They do not need to. What they review is the record of which rule fired and when, against the framework you adopted.
Governance for your coding agents
AI writes your code. You stay in charge.